From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jan 6 15:10: 6 2001 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 6 15:10:02 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6EE37B400 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 15:10:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f06NA2l62661; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 15:10:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 15:10:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200101062310.f06NA2l62661@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Akinori MUSHA" Subject: Re: ports/24114: New port: libtar: A library for manipulating POSIX and GNU tar files Reply-To: "Akinori MUSHA" Sender: gnats@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/24114; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Akinori MUSHA" To: George Reid Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/24114: New port: libtar: A library for manipulating POSIX and GNU tar files Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 08:05:15 +0900 At Sat, 6 Jan 2001 22:17:37 +0000 (GMT), George Reid wrote: > On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Akinori MUSHA wrote: > > > Seems to me that it should go under the `archiver' category, then. > > And not under 'devel' like zziplib? Perhaps this needs to be moved. Yes, and probably sysutils/{afio,guitar,gtar,star} too. They look more suitable in 'archiver' than in 'sysutils', judging from the meanings of their names and what they actually do. My 2 yen, -- / /__ __ Akinori.org / MUSHA.org / ) ) ) ) / FreeBSD.org / Ruby-lang.org Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ iDaemons.org / and.or.jp "We're only at home when we're on the run, on the wing, on the fly" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message