From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun 28 10:55:04 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28CA106564A;
	Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:55:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739BA8FC0A;
	Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:55:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27])
	by lava.sentex.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5SAqdOu074630;
	Sun, 28 Jun 2009 06:52:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <200906281052.n5SAqdOu074630@lava.sentex.ca>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 06:54:56 -0400
To: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <4A471F44.7010108@FreeBSD.org>
References: <4A4517BE.9040504@FreeBSD.org>
	<200906272303.n5RN3rTi070177@lava.sentex.ca>
	<4A471F44.7010108@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>, scottl@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:55:05 -0000

At 03:44 AM 6/28/2009, Alexander Motin wrote:

>I see no any relation to the patch here. I would say it is some 
>BIOS/loader problem, as kernel wasn't yet booted. Have you been ever 
>able to boot this system with AHCI enabled before?

Actually, I had never tried before.   It does not work either with a 
generic kernel.  Its a supermicro board. I will see if I can find a BIOS update

         ---Mike