Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Sep 1997 09:13:00 +0930
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Jamie Bowden <jamie@itribe.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD Chat <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Testimonial
Message-ID:  <19970917091300.51135@lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <199709161451.KAA03889@gatekeeper.itribe.net>; from Jamie Bowden on Tue, Sep 16, 1997 at 10:59:55AM -0400
References:  <199709160355.VAA00395@obie.softweyr.ml.org> <199709161451.KAA03889@gatekeeper.itribe.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 16, 1997 at 10:59:55AM -0400, Jamie Bowden wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 1997, Wes Peters wrote:
>
>> Joerg Wunsch stated:
>>> German is now actually swamped by English vocabulary, not only in the
>>> computer language.  It's already beginning to be embarassing, and
>>> English is quite often now called `Neudeutsch'.
>>
>> Jordan K. Hubbard writes:
>>> That's actually pretty funny considering how much english (American
>>> english, anyway) is populated with German words from all the German
>>> immigrants in the early 20th century.
>>
>> Hey, some of those immigrants were my ancestors!  Several of whom, by
>> the way, anglicized their surnames in 1918.  Wonder why?
>>
>> Historians used to date old english texts by the ratio of germanic to
>> latin words; I wonder how this free exchanged between the two languages
>> has affected their ability to date modern documents?  ;^)
>>
>>> It's gotten even worse since I got back, with some americans still
>>> going around shouting "fahrvergnugen!" at one another. ;-)
>>
>> ObJoke: What do you call four blondes in a Volkswagen?
>>
>> "Farfromthinkin!"
>>
>> --
>>           "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
>>
>> Wes Peters                                                       Softweyr LLC
>> http://www.xmission.com/~softweyr                       softweyr@xmission.com
>>
>
> Let's not forget that English is a Germanic language.  

Was.  They started adulterating it over 900 years ago.  It's
surprising how much remains.

> Moving structures and words back and forth isn't difficult.

No, but difficult is it, them to understand.  The English syntax has
in the course of the last millenium suffered.

Greg





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970917091300.51135>