From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 09:48:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2B116A401 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:48:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9BC113C48C for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:48:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178712091; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:48:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB7C2090; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:48:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 667275352; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:48:28 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" References: <2488F872-59CF-48DE-9297-5250B1C6EFB4@gmail.com> <20070411124201.GB83347@atarininja.org> <499c70c0704112227p97a229fv2c6badb18ee61500@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:48:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <499c70c0704112227p97a229fv2c6badb18ee61500@mail.gmail.com> (Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri's message of "Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:27:20 +0300") Message-ID: <86lkgxzzx0.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: sac , Wesley Shields , Curtis Vaughan , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:48:33 -0000 "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" writes: > May I ask you why do you prefer portsnap over them? It's simpler to use, and a lot faster. It's also HTTP-based, which makes it firewall-friendly, even in braindead corporate environments. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no