From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 18:40:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F113E16A4CE; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 18:40:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DE443D70; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 18:40:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (64-144-75-100.client.dsl.net [64.144.75.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB7Ie1ag099384 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:40:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:40:06 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: Ceri Davies Message-ID: <20041207134006.77677513@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20041207182426.GO513@submonkey.net> References: <1102429767.41b5be4722b47@netchild.homeip.net> <20041207175814.1DCD05D04@ptavv.es.net> <20041207182426.GO513@submonkey.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Tom Rhodes cc: Murray Stokely cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: Kevin Oberman cc: Murray Stokely cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Alexander Leidinger cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/docproj current.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 18:40:27 -0000 On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 18:24:26 +0000 Ceri Davies wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:58:14AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:29:27 +0100 > > > From: Alexander Leidinger > > > Sender: owner-cvs-all@freebsd.org > > > > > > Zitat von Ceri Davies : > > > > > > > > Perhaps we should sit down and come up with a valid color scheme > > > > > which we could all agree on? > > > > > > > > I don't mind. I've started using blue in my own stuff (e.g. > > > > http://shrike.submonkey.net/~ceri/doc/articles/dns-primer/) which I > > > > think looks nicer than red, but that's a real bikeshed for now. > > > > > > Blue is a cold color. Depending on what you want to achieve it's > > > appropriate, or not... > > > > > > Personally I don't think we should use a cold color. > > > > Blue is commonly thought of as "cold", but it is also the color to which > > the human eye is least responsive. On a white background a reasonably > > dark blue is pretty readable because to the luminance receptors (rods) on the > > retina, but it is poor in combination with other colors when there is > > not much luminance variation. It tends to look very fuzzy. > > Please, can we have this conversation when we have a chance of using the > results? I highly agree with Ceri here, everyone is more than welcome to work on a design and put it up somewhere. Then we'll all take a look at them. But until we have a chance to really review color schemes, layout, etc. Lets get some ideas on the table. Thank you. -- Tom Rhodes