From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Oct 19 12:07:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA26174 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 19 Oct 1997 12:07:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports) Received: from bob.scl.ameslab.gov (bob.scl.ameslab.gov [147.155.137.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA26167 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 1997 12:07:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ccsanady@bob.scl.ameslab.gov) Received: from bob.scl.ameslab.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bob.scl.ameslab.gov (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA01977 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 1997 14:07:07 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199710191907.OAA01977@bob.scl.ameslab.gov> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New ports added/updated last two weeks In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 19 Oct 1997 15:24:07 +0200." <199710191324.PAA00553@panke.panke.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Sun, 19 Oct 1997 14:07:06 -0500 From: Chris Csanady Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id MAA26169 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Mesa-2.2 > A graphics library similar to SGI's OpenGL. > Maintained by: ports@FreeBSD.ORG If you look at their web site, Mesa is currently at version 2.4. Is there a reason why this was not used instead? Chris