Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:03:20 -0600 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Roy Marples" <roy@marples.name> Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org>, freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Evolution crawls on FreeBSD Message-ID: <op.t7h9vuns9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <200803041827.42384.roy@marples.name> References: <20080301181608.5d393e02.ejcerejo@optonline.net> <20080304104855.8dk4kbnbac4g4kc4@webmail.leidinger.net> <47CD866C.8020909@freebsd.org> <200803041827.42384.roy@marples.name>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:27:42 -0600, Roy Marples <roy@marples.name> wrote=
:
> On Tuesday 04 March 2008 17:27:08 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>> All GNOME ports honor LDFLAGS.
>
> I'm pretty sure evolution didn't when I tested this a few months ago. =
=
> I'll retest once I get my fbsd box back up.
You can't just add in /etc/make.conf. You have to edit in =
evolution/Makefile. If you want to get make.conf works, it will need to =
be =
add ${LDFLAGS} like this:
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
CONFIGURE_ENV=3D CPPFLAGS=3D"-I${LOCALBASE}/include" \
LDFLAGS=3D"-L${LOCALBASE}/lib ${LDFLAGS}"
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Then add in make.conf:
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
LDFLAGS=3D-Wl,--as-needed
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
I haven't test it, but it should works.
>> That said, if you are using
>> the FBSD linker in G/FBSD, and you're not seeing this problem, there
>> must be something else that's keep Evo in the linker for so long. Th=
us
>> far, I haven't heard any default Gentoo option that may account for
>> this. Perhaps you have some other libtool patches or other custom
>> patches not in any version of FBSD...?
>
> Gentoo has a function called elibtoolize which tests and applies libto=
ol
> patches to the shipped copy. It's quite complicated as many packages s=
hip
> with old and customised libtools. Gentoo also forces packages to use t=
he =
> GNU
> versioning sytem of x.y.z instead of the fbsd single digit, which make=
s
> library upgrades a bit less painful. There's also patches to ensure th=
at
> parallel make and install work.
We have a hack for library version too, it's in Mk/bsd.gnome.mk called =
ltverhack. Near all of our ports (maintain by gnome) are using it, it =
helps a lot for upgrade just like with Gentoo. But you said that Gentoo =
=
get to use x.y.z and we just get to use correct ABI number. You can see =
=
the difference:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/x11/libgnome/pkg-plist.diff?=
r1=3D1.59;r2=3D1.60
-lib/libgnome-2.so.1000
+lib/libgnome-2.so.0
Cheers,
Mezz
> Gentoo also uses binutils-2.17 on G/FBSD whereas last Iooked FBSD uses=
=
> 2.15.
> Both use large and complicated patchsets compared to a vanilla binutil=
s.
>
> I can't be much more help as I don't use G/FBSD since I retired from =
> Gentoo,
> but I do idle in #gentoo-bsd where I'm trying to get some users to get=
a =
> list
> of all patches applied against evolution.
>
> Thanks
>
> Roy
-- =
mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.t7h9vuns9aq2h7>