Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:37:27 -0400 From: Gerard <gerard@seibercom.net> To: FreeBSD Question <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Network setup Message-ID: <20080404103727.59d03d64@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20080404124744.I13486@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <ee9dc2b40804040252v7d62c10cs80f201b9a3de0654@mail.gmail.com> <20080404063540.7e60d255@scorpio> <20080404124744.I13486@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/xW1+y=bwdibFEyeqQoKv=U. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:48:08 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > > I have the WRT150N myself; however, the setup is virtually the > > same. By the way, are you sure that you want to invest the time is > > using a 'G' protocol router? The 'N' version is readily available, > > much faster and has a greater range. =20 >=20 > even better - use cables. cheapest and fastest;) The OP stated, or at least I assumed that he meant that the network was rather extensive. Using cables, while it might provide a faster data transfer, could easily cost more to implement. If the OP can get the wireless network up and running easily enough, he might very well save a considerable amount of time. Since he did not provide a schematic of his network, that is just a guess. --=20 Gerard gerard@seibercom.net Wasn't there something about a PASCAL programmer knowing the value of everything and the Wirth of nothing? --Sig_/xW1+y=bwdibFEyeqQoKv=U. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkf2PS8ACgkQ6DWTaTcTwMki5wCg4yTzmQktKBilqli65IHBtX7x 5x8An3kxO3J3lghv9ABIPVHfcC9+9X2V =q0sb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/xW1+y=bwdibFEyeqQoKv=U.--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080404103727.59d03d64>