From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 27 09:03:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DFB37B40B for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:03:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DDC43FB1 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:03:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5RG2cKJ074083; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:02:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)h5RG2ckY074080; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:02:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:02:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Bosko Milekic In-Reply-To: <20030627115950.GA8424@technokratis.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: arch@freebsd.org cc: os@rsu.ru cc: "Michael A. Bushkov" Subject: Re: dynamically linked root and nscd X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:03:07 -0000 On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Bosko Milekic wrote: > I hate to intrude like this here, but I have a question. > > When you guys talk about "caching daemon," I hope you mean the same > thing. Do you mean "a daemon that would only do caching and be queried > by the libc stuff before the nss code calls the backend" or do you mean > "a daemon that the nss code would talk to and that would not only do > caching but also take care of calling the backend?" Because, in the > former case, you still need to dynamically link whereas in the latter > (more appealing case), you don't. What I have in mind is an NSS libc stub client that speaks to a UNIX domain socket, which hooks you up to nscd which dynamically links against the providers of the NSS lookup services. > I may be totally wrong here, but I could have sworn I saw someone > post about working/having worked on something like the latter somewhere > on our lists within the past two weeks. Could well be, and should definitely be looked at before implementing anything. It could also be that NetBSD has an nscd. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories