From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 13 20:05:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC931065672; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:05:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB948FC14; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:05:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5DK5MNm067640; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:05:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Message-ID: <4A340682.4030705@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:05:22 -0400 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090407) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pav@FreeBSD.org References: <1244916221.1261.10.camel@hood.oook.cz> <4A33FB7F.7040401@aldan.algebra.com> <1244922033.1261.19.camel@hood.oook.cz> <4A3401AA.40409@aldan.algebra.com> <1244922341.1261.20.camel@hood.oook.cz> <4A3404B0.6080205@aldan.algebra.com> <1244923357.1261.22.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <1244923357.1261.22.camel@hood.oook.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Erwin Lansing , apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: mod_dtcl-0.12.0_1 failed on amd64 8] X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:05:26 -0000 Pav Lucistnik написав(ла): > Mikhail T. píše v so 13. 06. 2009 v 15:57 -0400: > >> Pav Lucistnik написав(ла): >> >>> After closer look, it seems >>> - this failure is present on both 6.x and 8.x runs >>> - this failure was reported to you two months ago >>> >>> >> On May 27th (not two months ago) Erwin sent me a report about failure on >> i386: >> >> mod_dtcl.c -o mod_dtcl.So >> mod_dtcl.c: In function `get_parse_exec_file': >> mod_dtcl.c:383: warning: long unsigned int format, time_t arg (arg 4) >> mod_dtcl.c:383: warning: long unsigned int format, time_t arg (arg 5) >> >> >> That's a completely different error. I'm not aware of any other >> outstanding problems with the port. >> > > That was from old 6.x log, meanwhile > > mod_dtcl.c: In function 'get_parse_exec_file': > mod_dtcl.c:383: warning: format '%lx' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'time_t' > mod_dtcl.c:383: warning: format '%lx' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'time_t' > *** Error code 1 > > is an old log from 8.x which is the same thing, basically. > Agreed, I'll fix this i386-specific problem -- which is only two /weeks/ old -- and unbreak the port. > The log I had forwarded is not related to this and is a new, second > problem, that only recently appeared. > Whatever is wrong with linking will have to await response from apache@... Yours, -mi