From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 14 23:39:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C954F16A41A for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:39:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3089713C458; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:39:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47B4D139.5020701@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:39:37 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brett Bump References: <20080214114759.R75215@mail.rsts.org> <47B49A16.1080103@FreeBSD.org> <20080214131026.Y75492@mail.rsts.org> In-Reply-To: <20080214131026.Y75492@mail.rsts.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:39:40 -0000 Brett Bump wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> We are going to need more information about your system. What do you >> mean by "peak activity"? What is running on the system when it performs >> badly (check top -S, ps, gstat, vmstat -w, vmstat -i). What is your >> kernel configuration, dmesg and relevant aspects of the system >> configuration? >> >> Kris >> > > I would call 120 processes with a load average of 0.03 and 99.9 idle > with 10-20 sendmail processes and 30 apache jobs nothing to write home > about. But when that jumps to 250 processes, a load average of 30 with > 50% idle (5-10 second waits on single character ssh echo) a bit busy. > That usually means my heavy pop3 users are checking in at the same time > someone (or 2 or 3) have sent email to the large volume listservs. Proc > stat doesn't show as much as gstat and iostat. Gstat alwasy shows my > drive with /var/mail being 97-100% busy and iostat will always show hi > tps rates, but never anything above 8MB/s (4.10 gave me 30MB/s+). > > Kernel is generic with ipfirewall quota and smp (no ipfw rules yet). OK, then you definitely need to update to 6.3, quota support in older releases had performance problems. > [Thu Feb 14 09:59:23 2008] [notice] child pid 43464 exit signal Abort trap (6) > httpd in malloc(): error: recursive call > [Thu Feb 14 10:07:34 2008] [notice] child pid 85706 exit signal Abort trap (6) > httpd in free(): error: recursive call > [Thu Feb 14 10:48:39 2008] [notice] child pid 45621 exit signal Abort trap (6) > httpd in free(): error: recursive call These typically indicate application errors, or errors in how the applications are compiled (e.g. linked to inconsistent sets of libraries). Kris