From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 17 10:40:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A874D106566B for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:40:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968C08FC1F for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:40:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2HAe9GC009480 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:40:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2HAe9w4009479; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:40:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:40:09 GMT Message-Id: <200903171040.n2HAe9w4009479@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org From: Bruce Simpson Cc: Subject: Re: kern/132722: [ath] Wifi ath0 associates fine with AP, but DHCP or IP does not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bruce Simpson List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:40:10 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/132722; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bruce Simpson To: Matthias Apitz Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/132722: [ath] Wifi ath0 associates fine with AP, but DHCP or IP does not work Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:39:32 +0000 Matthias Apitz wrote: > as requested the output of dmesg(1) and the ath0 related part of > 'pciconf -lv'; pls note also that the Wifi works fine in general, i.e. > with the AP in my office (WPA) and in my home (WEP); > Is this an ASUS Eee PC? If so, which model is it? It looks like a 901. I tested OK with the 701. Sam said that there may be models of ath(4) requiring further changes to be back-ported from -CURRENT, this could well be one of them. cheers BMS