From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 17 22:21:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA04106568F; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:21:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610C98FC5B; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:21:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C6819E043; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:21:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (r5bb235.net.upc.cz [86.49.61.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A903C19E044; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:21:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A89D7FD.8080106@quip.cz> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:21:49 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4A89CB20.3000408@quip.cz> <4A89CD0E.7010106@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4A89CD0E.7010106@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster is not always recursive X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:21:53 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > Miroslav Lachman wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>I have some problem with portmaster. >>If I do upgrade of graphics/gd, portmaster check and upgrade all >>dependencies of gd (png, jpeg, pkg-config, freetype) but if upgrade of >>gd is called by upward recursive upgrade of jpeg library, I end up with >>new jpeg, new gd, new mrtg, but old png. It means that png was not >>upgraded as dependency of gd. > > > If png needed to be upgraded it should have been upgraded as a > dependency of gd even when using -r. I'll look into this, thanks for > your very detailed problem report. I have seen similar problem in the past with amavisd-new + spamassassin and their dependencies, but it is much bigger and complicated tree of dependencies and I have not evidence recorded for it. Reported case with jpeg / gd / png is the simplest one I have seen. Let me know if you need some more informations or test patches etc. Miroslav Lachman PS: Thanks for your work on my favourite ports-mgmt tool = portmaster ;)