From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 1 19:07:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680411065674 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 19:07:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shurd@sasktel.net) Received: from misav08.sasknet.sk.ca (misav08.sasknet.sk.ca [142.165.20.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A44C8FC20 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 19:07:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shurd@sasktel.net) Received: from bgmpomr2.sasknet.sk.ca ([142.165.72.23]) by misav08 with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 13:07:38 -0600 Received: from server.hurd.local (adsl-76-202-204-46.dsl.lsan03.sbcglobal.net [76.202.204.46]) by bgmpomr2.sasknet.sk.ca (SaskTel eMessaging Service) with ESMTPA id <0JX200EJFFSPHB40@bgmpomr2.sasknet.sk.ca> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 13:07:37 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:07:36 -0800 From: Stephen Hurd In-reply-to: <20080301131203.00001e51@westmark> To: Dick Hoogendijk Message-id: <47C9A978.4090501@sasktel.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <20080301131203.00001e51@westmark> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071123 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ad0 READ_DMA TIMEOUT errors on install of 7.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:07:39 -0000 Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:39:11 -0800 > Stephen Hurd wrote: > >> As a workaround, adding the line: >> hw.ata.ata_dma="0" >> To /boot/loader.conf will disable DMA and prevent the hangs that are >> caused by the DMA timeouts. >> > > Yeah, but having dma=1 makes the system faster, doesn't it? > It would if it worked, yes. But given a choice between fast and broken and slow and working, I find the decision pretty simple. :-)