Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 23:09:07 GMT From: mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa) To: ryan@sasknow.com (Ryan Thompson) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Funny routing problem... Message-ID: <38cc2217.1556358745@mail.sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <MAILPine.BSF.4.21.0003111450080.646-100000@ren.sasknow.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003101642550.6382-100000@ren.sasknow.com> <MAILPine.BSF.4.21.0003111450080.646-100000@ren.sasknow.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11 Mar 2000 16:18:32 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: >Ryan Thompson wrote to freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG: > >Growl... This will be a LONG message. :-) Since I haven't had any replies >yet, I suppose I'll include some more details. This is an extremely >simple office network. Am I doing something wrong, here? It would be easier for all to read if you just used the real IP addresses of 139.142.245.whatever instead of the xxxes. If the internal machine has as its interface an RFC1918 address, and the default gateway is is also on an RFC1918 address, the packet is going to leave the box as a RFC1918 address, so the outside world will not know how to get back to the address. e.g. try traceroute www.yahoo.com and traceroute -s 139.142.245.1 www.yahoo.com Also, please post the routing tables from all three machines. ---Mike Mike Tancsa (mdtancsa@sentex.net) Sentex Communications Corp, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada "Given enough time, 100 monkeys on 100 routers could setup a national IP network." (KDW2) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38cc2217.1556358745>