From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Apr 15 04:26:57 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA03364
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 04:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from saten.dyn.ml.org (201.ppp3.gulftel.com [208.222.58.201])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA03336;
          Wed, 15 Apr 1998 11:26:47 GMT
          (envelope-from lists@saten.dyn.ml.org)
Received: from localhost (lists@localhost)
	by saten.dyn.ml.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA10733;
	Wed, 15 Apr 1998 07:26:37 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 07:26:36 -0500 (CDT)
From: Phillip Salzman <lists@saten.dyn.ml.org>
To: Natty Dreds <natty@jua.res.cmu.edu>
cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: x11amp - possible with -STABLE?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980415073927.7420B-100000@jua.res.cmu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980415072536.10731A-100000@saten.dyn.ml.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

Nope, doesn't work.  The Linux-emu is different in
-CURRENT and -STABLE.  I was running it when I ran
a -CURRENT box, but since deleted it when I decided
to go back to -STABLE.

Phillip


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message