From owner-freebsd-current Sun Nov 17 21:15: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 931) id 76A1E37B401; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 21:15:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 21:15:00 -0800 From: Juli Mallett To: Doug Barton Cc: John De Boskey , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Run two copies of named from rc.conf? Message-ID: <20021117211500.A30150@FreeBSD.org> References: <20021118041523.GA45159@BSDWins.Com> <3DD8765A.D09BBD4A@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3DD8765A.D09BBD4A@FreeBSD.org>; from DougB@FreeBSD.org on Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 09:10:51PM -0800 Organisation: The FreeBSD Project X-Alternate-Addresses: , , , , X-Towel: Yes X-LiveJournal: flata, jmallett X-Negacore: Yes Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * De: Doug Barton [ Data: 2002-11-17 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Run two copies of named from rc.conf? ] > John De Boskey wrote: > > > > It would be nice if rc.conf could start a 2nd copy > > of named (split dns). > > IMO, running two named's on the same box is an edge case, and not likely > to be attractive to the majority of our userbase. I think you might be > better off with something in /usr/local/etc/rc.d. Or at least abstracting it in such a way that it doesn't get in anyone's way, and so it won't trigger the "what if I need N" where N>2 case, and in some meaningful way... Like maybe using a named_configs lists, and start one named for each config, or something. -- Juli Mallett OpenDarwin, Mono, FreeBSD Developer. ircd-hybrid Developer, EFnet addict. FreeBSD on MIPS-Anything on FreeBSD. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message