From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 24 21:19:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A0137B401 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E649E43F85 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:18:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h6P4IfFL071392; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 22:18:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 22:17:44 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030724.221744.66191711.imp@bsdimp.com> To: chris@behanna.org, behanna@behanna.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20030724231947.I30706@topperwein.pennasoft.com> References: <20030723223007.AD92C5D07@ptavv.es.net> <20030724231947.I30706@topperwein.pennasoft.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: We have ath, now what about Broadcom? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 04:19:01 -0000 In message: <20030724231947.I30706@topperwein.pennasoft.com> Chris BeHanna writes: : Can't they just redact that information from the spec.? Typically no. Even in a redacted spec it would be painfully obvious what to do. Also, different regulatory domains have different frequencies that are real no-nos in other regulatory domains and they'd need to document how to properly generate the RF in both cases. Warner