From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb  7 09:09:39 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135E4106564A;
	Mon,  7 Feb 2011 09:09:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E459F8FC0A;
	Mon,  7 Feb 2011 09:09:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 5034A56030; Mon,  7 Feb 2011 09:09:37 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:09:37 +0000
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20110207090937.GA31626@lonesome.com>
References: <201101152257.p0FMvSTR058827@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1101152358150.2354@gerinyyl.fvgr>
	<20110128212637.GB4687@lonesome.com>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1102022359120.14698@gerinyyl.fvgr>
	<1297028744.16814.33.camel@hood.oook.cz>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1102062342430.8943@gerinyyl>
	<4D4FB5C5.2070404@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D4FB5C5.2070404@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/metapixel Makefile distinfo
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 09:09:39 -0000

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:05:09AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Of course it is always good to work with maintainers. It's more  
> considerate to alert maintainer of the change than just go and change  
> the port behind his back.

And, for the maintainers that don't respond (at least to PRs), we _do_
track that.  Maintainers do get reset all the time; it's just not very
visible.

It's also fair to let portmgr know if a maintainer is ignoring multiple
emails.  (We see this also with our "this port fails to build on pointyhat"
emails.)

mcl