From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 9 18:59:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4F486B; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:59:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [84.237.50.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 822E62D65; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VTyyd-00007S-Fa; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 01:59:24 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r99IxXZv038381; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 01:59:43 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id r99IxRHJ038356; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 01:59:27 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 01:59:27 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: 10.0-hosted tinderbox: 8.4 builds broken? Message-ID: <20131009185927.GA37068@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20131009110955.GA75075@regency.nsu.ru> <20131009155950.GC95601@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131009155950.GC95601@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 18:59:31 -0000 On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 05:59:50PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 06:09:55PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > Why does it happen? I was under impression that 8.x will never switch to > > pkgng. Am I doing something wrong, or need to configure my tindy somehow? > > > 1/ yes 8.x will one day switch to pkgng :) but that is not the case yet. > 2/ this is one of the design bugs of tinderbox. The very recent update of > tinderbox might have fixed that one. It looks more like some recent update of tinderbox actually broke it: now, regardless of -b switch of tinderbuild command, "building for:" line in the logs always says "10.0-ALPHA4 i386", which is just another jail of mine. I will try to track it down and report of the results later. ./danfe