From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul  3 12:05:34 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF41106564A;
	Tue,  3 Jul 2012 12:05:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8548F14FA6C;
	Tue,  3 Jul 2012 12:05:34 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 05:05:34 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:13.0) Gecko/20120621 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Simmons <rsimmons0@gmail.com>
References: <CA+QLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+QLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 12:05:35 -0000

On 07/02/2012 19:08, Robert Simmons wrote:
> Are there plans to pull the following into head before the code freeze for 9.1?
> 
> BIND 9.9.1p1

We never change the version of BIND in a release branch. The 9.8 version
that's there is up to date.

The correct solution to this problem is to remove BIND from the base
altogether, but I have no energy for all the whinging that would happen
if I tried (again) to do that.

Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection