From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Apr 27 13:24:16 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA05397
          for questions-outgoing; Sat, 27 Apr 1996 13:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DGS.dgsys.com (root@dgs.dgsys.com [204.97.64.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA05385
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 1996 13:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from justine.elastica.com by DGS.dgsys.com (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA15260; Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:21:11 -0400
Received: (from robert@localhost) by justine.elastica.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA11438; Sat, 27 Apr 1996 20:23:24 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 20:23:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Robert Nicholson <robert@elastica.com>
Message-Id: <199604280023.UAA11438@justine.elastica.com>
To: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Ghostview..
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi, it's been a while since I've used ghostscript and ghostview...

am I right in suggesting that ghostview doesn't use the same fonts as
ghostscript?

For instance previewing the Hylafax documentation postscript in
ghostscript is very clear and crisp but the fonts don't appear to be
the same in ghostview.

I'm probably missing something.. I'll try and do some reading.