From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sun May 12 22:22:41 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA17935
          for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 12 May 1996 22:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA17929
          for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 12 May 1996 22:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) id PAA32694; Mon, 13 May 1996 15:20:31 +1000
Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 15:20:31 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199605130520.PAA32694@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: coredump@nervosa.com, wollman@lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: List of open Problem Reports
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> Well, I think I can speak for the FreeBSD Project (uh-oh!) when I say
>> ``We Disagree''.  We have had a terrible history in tracking bugs
>> submitted through any means, and it's important for us to have a
>> record of them.
>> -GAWollman

I think I agree :-) (the context of what I'm agreeing with was lost).

>Okay, well in that case, why doesn't the FreeBSD Project remove the 
>outdated and obviously fixed send-pr's?

Speaking for myself, it's because they aren't obviously fixed.

Bruce