Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 10:40:45 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CCD's - real concatenation? Message-ID: <352B461D.9C76F180@tdx.co.uk> References: <352B4193.8A6E52CA@tdx.co.uk> <19980408190617.06524@freebie.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Lehey wrote: > You *should* be able to configure disks this way if you don't > interleave. I haven't tried it, but I have looked through the source > code. It looks as if you can even specify interleave > 1 with unequal > partions, but in this case it truncates all the partitions to the size > of the smallest, definitely not what you want. I'd agree with that - considering it would chop everything down to the lowest common denominator... ;-) > vinum can do partial mirroring and true concatenation of unequal size > partitions. It can't interleave unequal sized partitions. I consider > it a bug, not a feature, than CCD should allow this. I'll agree with that as well... ;-) > > Or whether you can CCD' an allready CCD'd array? > > I still think this is a bad idea. Yes, your probably right - though it would be a handy way of concatenating two unequal CCD arrays into one big virtual drive... ;-) Regards, Karl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?352B461D.9C76F180>