From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 22 17: 5:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-107-187.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.187]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D9937B403 for ; Wed, 22 May 2002 17:05:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B2F3D66DC0; Wed, 22 May 2002 17:05:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 17:05:18 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Joe & Fhe Barbish Cc: FBSDQ Subject: Re: IPNAT frontend to IPFW Message-ID: <20020522170518.B69636@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from barbish@a1poweruser.com on Wed, May 22, 2002 at 07:12:37PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 07:12:37PM -0400, Joe & Fhe Barbish wrote: > Now in moving to cable ISP access I wanted to keep my=20 > IPFW advanced stateful keep-state rules firewall.=20 > The work around suggested, is to use IPNAT.=20 No, IPNAT is part of IPF and does not work with IPFW. natd(8) is the interface to IPFW's NAT implementation, which is also interfaced to by ppp's -nat flag. Kris --hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE87DI9Wry0BWjoQKURAhg+AKChcKATqcR0yW1Vw07xn0MIGjGklQCbBkKR zfo/2OFHknONy43jwbS045s= =Qt+5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hQiwHBbRI9kgIhsi-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message