Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 21 Nov 1997 09:54:57 -0500 (EST)
From:      Steve Hovey <shovey@buffnet.net>
To:        Kwoody <kwoody@citytel.net>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Is NE2000 network card OK?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSI.3.95.971121095423.10205M-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.971120085705.19949B-100000@mybsd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Nov 1997, Kwoody wrote:

> 
> 
> On Thu, 20 Nov 1997, Steve Hovey wrote:
> 
> > > How slow do you consider slow? I would think on a small network that a 
> > > card running ne2000 would be adequate for most purposes.
> > > 
> > 
> > I ran ne2000s till I saw the thru put difference I got from intels
> > therexpress cards - the price difference was slight compared to the
> > thruput - I mean I actually had to recompile my kernels to increase buffer
> > space (nmbclusters)
> 
> I'm fairly happy with the ne2000's here at home. I only run 2 machines 
> with them (though I do have a 3/60 also hooked up too) so for me 
> performence is not really in issue.
> 
> Though it might be intesting to see what kind of throughput I do get from 
> this little network. And one can get them to work better by increasing 
> the nbccluster in the kernel? (just want an excuse to recompile it again! :))

No - I had to increase it due to the amount of data flow increase per
second.  It was a result not a cause.

> 
> Anything in FBSD that I can use to measure network performence? (aside 
> from acutually buying a network monitor)
> 
> thanks!
> Keith
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Hovey
Chief Engineer
BuffNET		More Than Just a Connection!
------------------------------------------------------------------




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.95.971121095423.10205M-100000>