From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 6 10:26:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF936E4B for ; Wed, 6 May 2015 10:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B003A1165 for ; Wed, 6 May 2015 10:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t46AQwnN025160 for ; Wed, 6 May 2015 10:26:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199820] [new port] www/rubygem-html-pipeline Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 10:26:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: ports@toco-domains.de X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 10:26:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D199820 --- Comment #4 from Torsten Z=C3=BChlsdorff --- It's possible to install all rubygems only with the rubygem tool and comple= tely without pkg. I've wrote about this topic with xmj@. I will quote him, because that's why= i do the things this way: =3D=3D=3D Start =3D=3D=3D GitLab comes with an unmanageable amount of dependencies, which (as per rub= y@ policy) may not be installed via bundle, and have to be (or become, if not = yet available) ports themselves. Using ``bundle`` is taboo mostly because libra= ries thus installed don't register with pkg, and can't be deinstalled properly u= sing that tool either. =3D=3D=3D End =3D=3D=3D For me this is very convincing. Also it comes with the advantage, that we c= an provide binary-packages for pkg, which currently works. The GitLab port itself would be great. More than 100.000 organizations uses this software. And it is relatively hard to install and maintained. The FreeBSD-Ports tree offers a very simple method for this (compared to others= ). And it allows freedom. There are just a few gitlab-packages in other distributions and most of them comes with a full software-stack you cannot change.=20 Even the possibility to change the software-stack is enough for my company = to sponsor some working-time at the project and considering the use of FreeBSD. Normally the use Ubuntu and nothing else. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=