Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:10:00 -0600
From:      John E Hein <jhein@timing.com>
To:        Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/20601: DESTDIR and /etc/shells
Message-ID:  <15237.21768.492226.708910@brain.timing.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010823172108.B2573@mithrandr.moria.org>
References:  <200108231510.f7NFA2A96921@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010823172108.B2573@mithrandr.moria.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Neil Blakey-Milner wrote at 17:21 +0200 on Aug 23:
 > It's pretty obvious that a large number of ports will not support
 > DESTDIR immediately after the change.  However, I do believe it's
 > something we must have.  If I do some testing locally, can we move
 > forward with this a week after 4.4-RELEASE is out the door?

Sadly true that it's gone on so long this way.  Because of the sweeping
 nature of this change, I suggested in the 'Fix' for ports/28155 that a
 heads up be delivered to port maintainers a week or two before the patch
 is committed.  Too bad there's no notion of -current/-stable for ports,
 but I'm sure that's a sore subject.

I assume that question was for the rest of portmgr@, not me - a lowly
 FreeBSD peon.  But it sounds fine to me since we've been running with the
 patch committed in our local tree now for months.  I also have patches
 for various ports, but I've withheld from submitting PRs/patches until
 DESTDIR and PREFIX are treated properly in bsd.port.mk

Thanks for looking into it.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15237.21768.492226.708910>