From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jul 7 17:26:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C333A86E for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:26:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58CC155B for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E4A85A86D; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB208A86C for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x231.google.com (mail-pa0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96F831542; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by pacws9 with SMTP id ws9so117850747pac.0; Tue, 07 Jul 2015 10:26:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=moSYXkQaHxZpcv42bbnnClgwFy8dN2RUZSR48zpEW14=; b=XTNiYoJStJcZa+9DAuxSCxtqhgbyEqY4TZgaSdXhKBRP44v1w5hedbG4KaEKqaJ9h0 BSe+7yY4IhDsMRstcsF3797mt3A0ET9Gf9KQDWw0zNXybnAH0ktvVqqQ/KAhy7oA9K9s 5G0J4RHwUtRfEickO3iarT4wxn6qpRoLsnA18JgC3vpRj3b8mFxQcG+kP6VO0mskU/ru Sq73Rir+V8NIkV/ajASt1VUlxzI4djuXClXdNBdprai93eshBuPQ72nT4XERMceBu0YW vccbGQAXatQt/Qz4YItQp3evO2GG3qDD5B4DOg3XWnPZrr9LF+Ci/kX77SsjcsJX3pAP Crow== X-Received: by 10.66.190.228 with SMTP id gt4mr11208024pac.72.1436289961145; Tue, 07 Jul 2015 10:26:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:44b8:31ae:7b01::2? (2001-44b8-31ae-7b01-0000-0000-0000-0002.static.ipv6.internode.on.net. [2001:44b8:31ae:7b01::2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nk1sm22580547pdb.36.2015.07.07.10.25.58 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Jul 2015 10:26:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL References: <559B643F.3060409@calorieking.com> <559B6791.7050407@FreeBSD.org> <20150707170604.GI25718@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> To: Brooks Davis Cc: Gregory Orange , ohauer@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org From: Kubilay Kocak X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <559C0BA1.70300@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 03:25:53 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150707170604.GI25718@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 17:26:02 -0000 On 8/07/2015 3:06 AM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:45:53PM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote: >> On 7/07/2015 3:31 PM, Gregory Orange wrote: >>> Hi Olli and ports@, >>> >>> I don't know if this is a helpful forum to raise it, but I would like to >>> request that SASL be enabled in the default build options for >>> mail/postfix. I am attempting to use binary-only packages wherever >>> possible, and so far this is the first where I currently have to build >>> it myself. >>> >>> I would have thought SASL is in use across many Postfix installations, >>> but of course I could be wrong. I was tempted to try out >>> SMTP-after-IMAP, but since Postfix has the support, I think SASL is far >>> cleaner. >>> >>> Would any responders please include me in the CC? I am not subscribed to >>> the list. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Greg. >>> >> >> If consensus can't be achieved or there is a good reason not to enable >> this by default, then postfix-sasl as a slave port may be a desirable >> alternative, which I believe has existed in the past. >> >> I'm generally: >> >> +1 on security related options enabled by default >> +1 on OPTIONS_DEFAULT matching upstream defaults >> -1 on OPTIONS_DEFAULT introducing large dependency sets > > We need a port that allows dovecot2 SASL by default. There are a bunch of > turorials on setting up such systems and all of the have to start with "build > everything by hand" which makes us look bad. I've been somewhat tempted to > adding a slave port mail/postfix-useful with SASL, TLS, and DANE turned on. > A less trollish name might be better though. :) > > -- Brooks > svn mv postfix postfix-lite ? svn cp postfix postfix-full ? :) Seriously though, it *is* tough to find the a 'desirable' intersection of default features that suits most/all people. Insufficient reason not to try though.