Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 12:06:39 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: phk@FreeBSD.org Cc: mi@privatelabs.com, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/18193: Bogus diagnostics by nslookup(1) Message-ID: <20010602120639.F24747@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <200106020903.f5293JR35092@freefall.freebsd.org>; from phk@FreeBSD.org on Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 02:03:19AM -0700 References: <200106020903.f5293JR35092@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 02:03:19AM -0700, phk@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: Bogus diagnostics by nslookup(1) > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: phk > State-Changed-When: Sat Jun 2 02:02:58 PDT 2001 > State-Changed-Why: > Take this up with the BIND developers. I don't think there would even be sense in taking it up with the BIND developers. As documented in several BIND releases, nslookup(1) is highly deprecated, and even the BIND suite has a much better replacement for DNS diagnostics, namely, dig(1). G'luck, Peter -- Do you think anybody has ever had *precisely this thought* before? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010602120639.F24747>