From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 13 15:46:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF17A106564A for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3428FC08 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:46:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=fYrudtiu+8B3G757uRRvzeZd/2l6XY0VJaSp6RDazbM=; b=sH0gc13d7G5r2Vc9M/Z+qTbZuL0KXohhqgqcd9Nc2vmPMU6RISLW4qXFpjUdmJo1yoVJNa/kM+KomdvTX80GbYeTbpWEAcjRAHMqXfqAVcD3wF5n7gAt4eSR4RDL98QO; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SIihn-000Fjn-Gm for apache@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:46:39 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1334331989-23734-23733/5/18; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:46:29 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: apache@freebsd.org References: Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:46:29 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.62 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: apache 2.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:46:39 -0000 On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 04:57:15 -0500, Espen Tagestad wrote: > any plans for Apache 2.3 in ports in the near future? I imagine we will see Apache 2.4 in ports soon. I believe the odd numbered releases are not "stable". I'd have to double check that, though.