From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 24 12:59:10 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7609C16A4CE; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:59:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0B3A743D31; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:59:10 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i2OKx2tf029146;
	Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:59:02 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:59:02 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com
To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040324194600.GA8779@dragon.nuxi.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10403241557130.26506-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: FreeBSD current users <current@freebsd.org>
cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
Subject: Re: SF Bay area hackfest
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:59:10 -0000

On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, David O'Brien wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 04:49:51PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > I don't quite understand why you need commitments for a toolchain
> > upgrade.  From what I understand, TLS support can't happen without
> > it, and by deferring the toolchain update you prevent it from
> > getting done.  But I'll play along regardless...
> 
> SMPng and KSE are both projects that haven't been completed because the
> project only had commitments for the 1st part of the work.  I refused to
> pushed to import new toolchain bits for the to sit dormant not being
> used.  I'd rather use my time working on another part of FreeBSD if the
> net of my time & effort is a NOP.

OK, that's certainly valid.

-- 
Dan Eischen