From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 18 00:49:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68078106568F for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:49:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF3B8FC55 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:49:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27277 invoked by uid 399); 18 Aug 2009 00:49:10 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 18 Aug 2009 00:49:10 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4A89FA80.8090308@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:49:04 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090729) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> References: <4A89CB20.3000408@quip.cz> <4A89CD0E.7010106@FreeBSD.org> <4A89D7FD.8080106@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <4A89D7FD.8080106@quip.cz> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster is not always recursive X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:49:14 -0000 Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: >> Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have some problem with portmaster. >>> If I do upgrade of graphics/gd, portmaster check and upgrade all >>> dependencies of gd (png, jpeg, pkg-config, freetype) but if upgrade of >>> gd is called by upward recursive upgrade of jpeg library, I end up with >>> new jpeg, new gd, new mrtg, but old png. It means that png was not >>> upgraded as dependency of gd. >> >> >> If png needed to be upgraded it should have been upgraded as a >> dependency of gd even when using -r. I'll look into this, thanks for >> your very detailed problem report. > > I have seen similar problem in the past with amavisd-new + spamassassin > and their dependencies, but it is much bigger and complicated tree of > dependencies and I have not evidence recorded for it. > Reported case with jpeg / gd / png is the simplest one I have seen. Were these other cases also with the -r option, or were they when doing "regular" upgrades? > PS: Thanks for your work on my favourite ports-mgmt tool = portmaster ;) You're welcome, and thanks for the kind words. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection