Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 09:43:56 -0800 (PST) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: current@freebsd.org Cc: wollman@lcs.mit.edu Subject: Re: OpenSSL question for id_function() Message-ID: <200302271743.h1RHhuGw029809@vashon.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <200302271715.h1RHFri9048957@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <20030225155724.GB9400@attbi.com> <200302271640.h1RGeMx2029701@vashon.polstra.com> <200302271715.h1RHFri9048957@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <200302271715.h1RHFri9048957@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> wrote: > > We could define pthread_t as __intptr_t without making significant > changes to the implementation. Agreed. I think it would be "nicer" if it were a small integer like a file descriptor -- i.e., an index into a table containing the actual structures. I suspect that was the intent of the standard writers. But faking it into an __intptr_t would satisfy the text of the standard. John -- John Polstra John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302271743.h1RHhuGw029809>