Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 09:39:06 -0700 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Overriding compiler flags (Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc.295 gcc.c) Message-ID: <20010530163906.27321380E@overcee.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105302323390.18042-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: [..] > > The latter three obviously don't cover general code, but the plethora > > of options is starting to get ugly. > > I agree. It got ugly already :-). And we don't even install the specs > file in /usr/libdata/gcc. Yes, because it just slows things down since gcc has to parse the file. Maybe we should install /usr/libdata/gcc/specs.default or something? I have found using the specs file *very* useful in the past when working on toolchain issues. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010530163906.27321380E>