From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jul 20 23: 0: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from 200-191-159-129-as.acessonet.com.br (200-191-159-129-as.acessonet.com.br [200.191.159.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E570737B5CE for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 22:59:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lioux@uol.com.br) Received: (qmail 335 invoked by uid 1001); 20 Jul 2000 12:51:02 -0000 From: "Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira" Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 09:50:40 -0300 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Signal 11 on 4-Stable buildworld; bad memory or what? Message-ID: <20000720095040.A296@Fedaykin.here> References: <20000719170435.A210@Fedaykin.here> <000e01bff1c0$c2abb130$b8209fc0@campbellmithun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <000e01bff1c0$c2abb130$b8209fc0@campbellmithun.com>; from swb@grasslake.net on Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 03:34:16PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 03:34:16PM -0500, Shawn Barnhart wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira" > To: > > | Before blaming freebsd, either sigbus errors or > | signal 11 should be checked for either bad hardware or memory. > > season on -STABLE. I was ALREADY assuming broken hardware, and was surprised > that the pounding the machine got under Windows didn't reveal any problems. Sorry. I was not being harsh. I keep forgetting that emails do not convey emotion unless I put some smily faces. :) > >From my original message: > > (As an aside, I was checking for info on my board, an Asus TXP4, on USENET > and supposedly it will do an unadvertised 75 and 83Mhz FSB. Anyone know how > overclockable K6-233 CPUs are?) Close to none. The bus should be the last thing you touch when overclocking because it can cause all kind of trouble. However, I am no expert though using k6s for the past 2 years. My experience is that they get really unstable with more than 50 Mhz overclock due to temperature restrictions specially (high voltage). The k6-2, k6-3 and k6-2+ should be better suitable for overclocking in this particular order. You should consult http://www.tomshardware.com/ for a complete overclocking guide IMHO. Regards, Mario Ferreira To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message