Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:43:25 +0800
From:      "Jian Qiu" <swordqiu@gmail.com>
To:        "Kris Kennaway" <kris@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: What's the status of parallel netisr?
Message-ID:  <e8520310809160743v46b5cf18jd78f6043eaeccaa3@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <48CF6450.6020909@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <e8520310809151020j29b8870v3167cb2879e8543d@mail.gmail.com> <48CF6450.6020909@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Interesting.

I did a test on local UDP throughput.

I was surprised to find out the performance with a SMP kernel was
worse than UP. (~74MB/s v.s. 96 MB/s).

I had though parallel netisr might be a solution.

Anyway, thanks for the info.

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Jian Qiu wrote:
>>
>> I noticed there was a project trying to parallelize netisr in SMP.
>>
>> But I cannot find the relevant codes in either stable 7 or current 8.
>>
>> I'm wondering what's the current status of this project?
>>
>> When will it be merged into FreeBSD source tree?
>
> It's available in a perforce branch owned by rwatson (sorry, I don't have
> the branch name handy), but in my tests it either produced no benefits, or
> actually reduced performance.  This is surprising and the reasons for this
> are still unknown.
>
> Kris
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e8520310809160743v46b5cf18jd78f6043eaeccaa3>