From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 2 19:50:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2768A106564A for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 19:50:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C818FC1A for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 19:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SauL8-000C5I-7W for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:50:22 +0200 Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 21:50:22 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120602195022.GG5335@home.opsec.eu> References: <1405746.nVtAo183hi@x220.ovitrap.com> <4FC9FECC.8090703@digsys.bg> <3303845.JjFTmctz7f@x220.ovitrap.com> <4FCA0B5F.5010500@digsys.bg> <4FCA20C5.6010901@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <95D35900-AC63-4948-B54F-40041FFCB232@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <95D35900-AC63-4948-B54F-40041FFCB232@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 19:50:21 -0000 Hi! > The point he made was actually not a matter of people not reading > UPDATING but that UPDATING is oftentimes not updated until after > the disruptive/potentially dangerous change has already hit the > ports tree. > > I'm not sure what the solution is for the end user. We have our reference hosts, do daily portupgrades and on those days where all looks fine, pkg_create the whole collection and pkg_delete/pkg_add to production hosts. Still not perfect, but 'good enough'. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 8 years to go !