From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 19 17:45:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCBF16A4CE for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 17:45:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFB4243D1D for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 17:45:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from varga@stonehenge.sk) Received: (qmail 16604 invoked by uid 0); 19 Mar 2005 17:45:32 -0000 Received: from r4aq149.chello.upc.cz (84.42.170.149) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 19 Mar 2005 17:45:32 -0000 From: Michal Varga To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Stonehenge Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:45:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1111254335.39766.14.camel@xenon.stonehenge.sk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: graphics/blender-devel broken with scons-0.96.90 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 17:45:37 -0000 Hi, I don't know if someone noticed (I've just subscribed to the list, but didn't find any reference in the history) - scons-0.96.90 from Feb 19. (devel/scons) breaks the build of graphics/blender-devel. According to http://www.scons.org/ , the .90 brings a "number of extensive changes to internal subsystems", so shouldn't we have left the previous version too in the ports collection in such cases? m. -- Michal Varga Stonehenge