From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 21 04:34:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49B1106566C for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 04:34:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2188FC0C for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 04:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 20 Nov 2010 23:34:46 -0500 Received: from mx04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (mx04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.54]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id ASY07420; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 23:34:31 -0500 Received: from 209-6-91-204.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 20 Nov 2010 23:34:31 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19688.41302.976685.849999@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 23:34:30 -0500 To: Charlie Kester In-Reply-To: <20101121040511.GC48679@comcast.net> References: <20101121012336.GM13998@comcast.net> <20101121032306.GB48679@comcast.net> <19688.37613.144903.851371@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20101121040511.GC48679@comcast.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to detect filename conflicts with uninstalled ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 04:34:49 -0000 Charlie Kester writes: > But I expect these two find & greps will detect the majority of > filename conflicts. Unless someone has a better recommendation, > I'll settle for less than perfect. If this is a one-time thing, your best policy might be to provide the (proposed) name and see if anyone raises a red flag. Robert Huff