From owner-freebsd-current Mon Sep 13 2: 2:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gidora.zeta.org.au (gidora.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E5FF154DC for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 02:02:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: (qmail 30507 invoked from network); 13 Sep 1999 09:02:48 -0000 Received: from d214.syd2.zeta.org.au (203.26.9.86) by gidora.zeta.org.au with SMTP; 13 Sep 1999 09:02:48 -0000 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 19:02:43 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-Sender: bde@alphplex.bde.org To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: profiling on kernels In-Reply-To: <19990913074343.B89309@daemon.ninth-circle.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >More complete patches ahve already been applied to -current: > > > >RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/isa/prof_machdep.c,v > >Working file: prof_machdep.c > >head: 1.14 > > I checked, I do have rev 1.14 in place and it borks. > > How far off is the chance of -p going haywire with some kernel options? Not large. I run regression tests on GENERIC and LINT (config -pp) on most days. Profiling hasn't caused any compile-time problems for several months (-pp is only broken at runtime). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message