From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Mar 11 18:29:36 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA03292 for bugs-outgoing; Sat, 11 Mar 1995 18:29:36 -0800 Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA03286 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 1995 18:29:32 -0800 Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id TAA21374; Sat, 11 Mar 1995 19:32:19 -0700 Date: Sat, 11 Mar 1995 19:32:19 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199503120232.TAA21374@trout.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: "Rodney W. Grimes" "Re: bin/239: Multiply defined symbols in the libraries" (Mar 11, 6:16pm) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: "Rodney W. Grimes" , mark@grondar.za Subject: Re: bin/239: Multiply defined symbols in the libraries Cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > If you where reading the correct mailling lists (freebsd-current) you > would know that we all know about this bug and work is being done to > fix it. Actually, in defense of Mark I'd like to point out that I'd rather see too many bug reports than too few. If I understood GNATS better I would have set the bug report to 'analyzed', but at this time my time is better spent trying to fix it than trying to figure out GNATS. By submitting things as bug reports things don't get lost in the cracks. Nate ps. Rod, remember he doesn't see the messages I've sent to the core list describing the status of the bug.