From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Apr 8 03:05:58 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA09306 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 03:05:58 -0700 Received: from vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.142.36]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA09288 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 03:05:02 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA06899 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 1995 01:10:23 +0200 Message-Id: <199504062310.BAA06899@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> X-Authentication-Warning: vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: The FreeBSD trademark. In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 06 Apr 1995 11:42:48 +0200." <21198.797161368@freefall.cdrom.com> Date: Fri, 07 Apr 1995 01:10:23 +0200 From: Julian Howard Stacey Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jordan wrote: > You can't possibly > sit there and tell me that "housing" ourselves under the umbrella of a > notoriously bloated organization like the ISO or CCITT is going to be > LESS work, now can you? Didnt know they were bloated, go find a non bloated one then :-) > And you completely ignored my other points, which was that the > necessary INFRASTRUCTURE is here! Where the coms links are & where the sup servers & cvs are physically has little relevance to whose law is best used, you'd be best advised offloading the paper work on willing helpers in other countries who want to help, but aren't quite up to you mega hacker/techie standard, or are you afraid of loosing control ?. > I'd go to england if I wanted fish and chips You miss the point, I am Not promoting my own country (though you are yours ;-). We should minimise FreeBSD's involvement with the USA national legal system because it has proven itself disruptive to FreeBSD (crypt etc). If you insist on forcing national law on an international organisation, go use Irish or New Zealand law or something instead., I don't care whose, anyone's law Except disruptive USA law. Julian S