From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 27 16:39:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A2337B401 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:39:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remt26.cluster1.charter.net (remt26.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.8.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7244D43FF2 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:39:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glennpj@charter.net) Received: from [24.158.214.251] (HELO gforce.johnson.home) by remt26.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 72680773; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 19:39:14 -0400 Received: from gforce.johnson.home (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gforce.johnson.home (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5RNdCVb095444; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:39:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from glenn@gforce.johnson.home) Received: (from glenn@localhost) by gforce.johnson.home (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5RNdCoM095439; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:39:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from glenn) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:39:12 -0500 From: Glenn Johnson To: Doug White Message-ID: <20030627233912.GA90348@gforce.johnson.home> Mail-Followup-To: Doug White , current@freebsd.org References: <20030627181836.GA81335@node1.cluster.srrc.usda.gov> <20030627154252.X5016@carver.gumbysoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030627154252.X5016@carver.gumbysoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hyperthreading X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 23:39:16 -0000 On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 03:46:47PM -0700, Doug White wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote: > > > I have a P4 processor on order that will support hyperthreading. > > I was wondering what the general opinion is on enabling HTT for > > FreeBSD-5 (current). > > > > Thanks for any input. > > man 4 smp > > See the machdep.hlt_logical_cpus sysctl. Thanks. I had read the smp manual page. I know _how_ to enable HTT; I was wondering whether I _should_ enable it. It seems the answer is that it is not beneficial in its current state because the scheduler does not yet differentiate between physical and logical processors. -- Glenn Johnson glennpj@charter.net