From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 19 16:07:33 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2231016A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:07:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from tierra2.ng.fadesa.es (tierra2.ng.fadesa.es [195.55.55.166])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C6743D5C
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:07:32 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from fandino@ng.fadesa.es)
Received: from [195.55.55.163] ([195.55.55.163])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by tierra2.ng.fadesa.es (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9JG7Vi3002174
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:07:31 +0200
Message-ID: <41753BC3.80807@ng.fadesa.es>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:07:31 +0200
From: fandino <fandino@ng.fadesa.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616
X-Accept-Language: gl, en, es
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
References: <20041015190638.C5A0E5D04@ptavv.es.net>
	<41715E7F.7060509@ng.fadesa.es>
	<20041018100045.f8koww0skcco0woo@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz>
	<4173D66F.6010200@DeepCore.dk> <4173F2E9.7010407@ng.fadesa.es>
	<417406E3.9010706@DeepCore.dk> <4174FD04.8040000@ng.fadesa.es>
	<20041019104525.ikgw8kcw8sw480os@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz>
	<20041019155848.GA55255@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20041019120050.uscwo4c8kco4g44s@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz>
In-Reply-To: <20041019120050.uscwo4c8kco4g44s@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Authenticated-Sender: user fandino from 195.55.55.163
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1, clamav-milter version 0.75c
	on tierra2
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3b7and poor ata performance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: fandino@ng.fadesa.es
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:07:33 -0000

Kenneth Culver wrote:
> Quoting Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>:
> 
>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 10:45:25AM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
>>
>>> This is with a custom kernel with all debugging options off. I 
>>> haven't seen a
>>> mail from you yet that says whether you turned off debugging options 
>>> in the
>>> kernel or not, and if you haven't turned off debugging options, I'd 
>>> strongly
>>> suggest doing so.
>>
>>
>> In fact he's said so several times.
>>
>> Kris
> 
> 
> OK, well I must've missed it then and I apologize for that, however, I 
> still
> don't see any reason why his hardware would perform so much worse than 
> mine,
> aside from the something being wrong with his hardware setup, or the 
> driver for
> his particular ata chip.

If that was so, why OpenBSD, Linux (and windows) outperform FreeBSD?

They are almost two times faster than FBSD, using the same hardware.