Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:06:02 +0100 (CET)
From:      Søren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>
To:        Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com>
Cc:        "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>, "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Thomas Quinot <thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Updated ATAPI/CAM patches
Message-ID:  <200202282106.g1SL62U02937@freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <1014928652.6021.5.camel@hollin.btc.adaptec.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems Scott Long wrote:
> > As I have stated several times, I have no problem with ATAPI being
> > sent through CAM as long as the usual way stays (some of us cannot
> > afford the weight of those extra layers, nor loose functionality).
> > I'd do the integration somewhat differently to even further minimise 
> > the diffs, but that is really not the issue here...
> > So if we can get *serious* commitment from a committer to take up
> > these loose ends, lets talk about what to do, if not my offer stands :)
> 
> I'll raise my hand here.  I've been keenly interested in this for a
> while, since it will make my UDF work much simpler.  I'm also getting my

Hmm, your UDF code should know nothing about the lower layers, but 
we've been over that already :)

> feet wet in CAM, and I have the two CAM gurus nearby if things get too
> hairy.  I fully indend for this to be a cooperative effort with Thomas;
> I'm mainly raising my hand to take the abuse that will no doubt happen
> once in a while.

Sure, maybe we should make Thomas a committer so he could look after
it himself ? Interested ? Got the time ? I'm all ears for volounteers...

-Søren

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200202282106.g1SL62U02937>