Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:13:31 +0930 From: "O'Connor, Daniel" <darius@dons.net.au> To: "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: fsck vs zvol Message-ID: <2E0A8530-28DD-4719-BE99-9D9A486CB18D@dons.net.au> In-Reply-To: <C5136C74-E8EB-4FAE-B061-D85783AC6B35@punkt.de> References: <06546140-1B02-432D-8B7C-525AA1EA4FBA@dons.net.au> <C5136C74-E8EB-4FAE-B061-D85783AC6B35@punkt.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 12 Jun 2019, at 15:47, Patrick M. Hausen <hausen@punkt.de> wrote: >> Am 12.06.2019 um 03:04 schrieb O'Connor, Daniel <darius@dons.net.au>: >> I have a small UFS partition that is the sysvol for Samba 4 = (otherwise it doesn't work due to ACL issues). >=20 > AFAIK this was fixed by iX Systems for Samba 4.9: >=20 > https://jira.ixsystems.com/browse/NAS-100698 >=20 > You might want to check if they upstreamed it or if the patch can be > incorporated in the FreeBSD port if not. Thanks, I see the samba48 port has a ZFS provisioning patch so I guess = it's not necessary anymore. = https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/net/samba48/files/0001-Zfs-provision= -1.patch?revision=3D475995&view=3Dmarkup I'll find out when I get around to setting up another Samba 4 on ZFS but = not sure how long that will be :( -- Daniel O'Connor "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2E0A8530-28DD-4719-BE99-9D9A486CB18D>