From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Apr 8 03:15:54 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA09522 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 03:15:54 -0700 Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA09510 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 03:15:39 -0700 Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id MAA05881 for hackers@freebsd.org; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 12:05:35 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199504081005.MAA05881@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Install scripts To: hackers@FreeBSD.org Date: Sat, 8 Apr 1995 12:05:35 +0200 (MET DST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1173 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I don't know if the current installation scripts is going to be used for more snapshots/releases. However, would someone mind doing the following addition to /release/scripts/netinst.sh: "ie0" "AT&T StarLan and EN100 family at 0x360 and IRQ 7" \ "is0" "Isolan 4141-0 or Isolink 4110 at 0x280 and IRQ 7" \ + "lnc0" "Ether 32V board (VL ethernet card)" \ "ix0" "Intel EtherExpress" \ "le0" "DEC Etherworks ethernet adapter" \ so that the lnc boards are supported. Also, does someone object to changing the default base address for lnc0 from 0x280 to 0x300 (in the GENERIC kernel) ? The board (at least mine) cannot be configured for an address below 0x300, and the fact that I didn't see complaints about the previous bug suggests me that people are not using it at the moment. Thanks Luigi ==================================================================== Luigi Rizzo Dip. di Ingegneria dell'Informazione email: luigi@iet.unipi.it Universita' di Pisa tel: +39-50-568533 via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy) fax: +39-50-568522 ====================================================================