From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 20 06:40:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F9116A416 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:40:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3376843C9F for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:40:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBK6eGqR062421 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:40:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id kBK6eFq4062420; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:40:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:40:16 GMT Message-Id: <200612200640.kBK6eFq4062420@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Timothy Beyer Cc: Subject: Re: ports/95990: New Port: emulators/xjoypad X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Timothy Beyer List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:40:16 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/95990; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Timothy Beyer To: Gabor Kovesdan Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, beyert@cs.ucr.edu Subject: Re: ports/95990: New Port: emulators/xjoypad Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:21:14 -0800 At Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:15:50 +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > > Dear Submitter, > > are you still interested in fixing this port so that it can be committed, > or can we close this problem report? I'm looking forward to > your answer. Thank you for your time on contributing to FreeBSD. > > Regards, > Gabor Kovesdan I'm definitely interested in fixing the problem, but I have not yet been able to reproduce the faulty result that the tester mentioned. I am going to update to the latest version of the linuxulator and see if that brings up the problem, the version of linuxlator I have installed is linux_base-8-8.0_6, not linux_base-fc-4_9 as is in current. --Tim