From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Dec 21 04:18:44 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA26156
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 21 Dec 1997 04:18:44 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA26151
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 21 Dec 1997 04:18:27 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.6.9) id XAA10842; Sun, 21 Dec 1997 23:13:34 +1100
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 1997 23:13:34 +1100
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199712211213.XAA10842@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: current@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@time.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: -current release build is broken (last 3 days)
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>===> lib/libcom_err/doc
>cd /usr/src/lib/libcom_err/doc ; make install DESTDIR=/R/stage/trees/info SHARED
>=copies
>make: don't know how to make /R/stage/trees/info/usr/share/info/dir. Stop
>*** Error code 2
>
>Which brings up a point (was it Satoshi who was last fooling with
>this?) - shouldn't there be some way of dealing with this dependancy
>on a dir file?  When's the right time to install it, if so much
>depends on it, or should a version be created on demand?  If on

It is installed at the start of `make install' in -current.  2.2's
/usr/src/Makefile is still missing this.  Apparently `make release'
for -current isn't using the current /usr/src/Makefile.  This might
happen if only /usr/src/release is current.

Bruce